|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Jump lines
Chimney Sweep Commercial Real Estate Computers Dental Discount Membership Fabric and Crafts Flooring Home Health Care Internet Provider Magazine Money Saving Coupons Newspapers Notary Palmdale Info Pharmacy Real Estate Rentals RV and Truck Repair School Shopping Transit Travel Used Cars |
Antennas for TV making a comebackBy BILL HUSTED ATLANTA - Reader e-mail is the world's best crystal ball - better than the professional tech Web sites I follow - for spotting technology trends. Maybe you're trimming costs by eliminating cable and satellite, or perhaps you are using an antenna as a back-up method. All I know is that I can confirm the trend by seeing rooftops studded with antennas when Lucy the Beagle and I survey my own neighborhood. I've written about antennas before. Today I get some help from a fellow who helped write the book on antennas: Arthur Gubeskys - a Ph.d engineer with a fistful of wireless reception patents dating from his time at Motorola. Today he is chief technology officer for the HDTV Antenna Labs Web site (http://www.hdtvantennalabs.com/hdtv-antenna-guide.php). Our conversation covered topics you've been asking me about. For those who want to dig deeper into some of Arthur's answers, I've provided links to Web sites that go into more detail. Q: Obviously a tall outdoor antenna will outperform rabbit ears. But many of my readers won't use tall ones because of restrictions or aesthetics. What are their options? A: Rooftop installation is always the best option. Putting the antenna in the attic is second best. Unless you have a metal or concrete roof, that's a good compromise. Unfortunately, indoor antennas are only good in close proximity to TV towers. Q: I've heard that getting the signal using an antenna results in a better picture than someone would get using satellite or cable because less compression is used for over-the-air signals. Is this true? A: It's not necessarily true. When the entire bandwidth is used on satellite or cable to transmit a single HD signal there is no need for high signal compression and the quality is superb. However, when the broadcaster uses multicasting - that's using the same bandwidth for multiple programs and it sometimes happens, higher compression ratios must be used and degradation of picture quality can be visible. Broadcasters may argue that. It is a subjective thing. Q: I see antennas advertised as "designed for digital" or as a "special HDTV antenna." To me, an antenna is an antenna. Am I misinformed? A: There is no such thing as an HDTV antenna. You're right - an antenna is an antenna. Digital and analog television are on the same frequency bands, so any antenna that is good for analog TV is also good for digital TV. Q: Where can the average person - someone not well-versed in antenna technology - go for more information? A: I would recommend dtvanswers.com and of course our own Web site, HDTV Antenna Labs. I hope this helps. As a long-time ham radio operator, I've been in love with antennas for a long time. My wife strongly disagrees, but putting a little aluminum in the sky is a beautiful thing. Bill Husted writes for The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. E-mail: tecbud(at)bellsouth.net. |
||||||||||||||